Home / Blog / Article
AI Consulting · 7 min read

Claude, GPT or open-source: how to actually choose

Model choice isn't a loyalty decision. It's a per-use-case fit question, and the answer changes depending on what you're building.

Quick summary
  • The best model differs by use-case — there's rarely one right answer for a whole company.
  • Reasoning-heavy tasks and long-context tasks favor different models than simple classification.
  • Open-source wins when data residency or per-token cost at high volume matters most.
  • An abstraction layer lets you swap models later without rewriting product code.

Stop picking a company-wide default

The instinct to declare 'we're a Claude shop' or 'we're on OpenAI' company-wide ignores that different use-cases have different needs. A customer-facing writing assistant and a high-volume ticket classifier optimize for completely different things, and locking into one vendor for both usually means one of them is underserved.

Reasoning-heavy tasks need different testing than classification

Tasks that require multi-step reasoning — analysis, planning, complex Q&A — benefit from models tuned for that, and the differences between providers show up clearly on this kind of task. Simple classification or extraction tasks are far more forgiving, and a smaller, cheaper model often performs just as well.

“There's rarely one right model for a whole company — the fit changes with the use-case.”

Cost at volume changes the calculus

A model that's a great fit for a low-volume, high-value use-case (like a research assistant used by five analysts) can be the wrong economic choice for a high-volume use-case (like classifying every inbound support ticket). Open-source, self-hosted options often win purely on per-token cost once volume is high enough.

Data residency rules some options out entirely

For fintech, healthcare, or any business with strict data residency or retention requirements, the model choice is sometimes decided before quality is even considered — some providers simply can't meet the compliance bar for a given region or industry, which narrows the field immediately.

3
major model families to evaluate
1
abstraction layer that future-proofs the choice
0
vendor loyalty in the decision

Build the abstraction layer regardless

Whatever you pick today, wrap it in an abstraction layer that separates your product code from the specific model API. Pricing changes, new models launch, and a client's compliance needs shift — teams with that layer swap providers in a day; teams without it face a multi-week rewrite.

→ / Keep reading

Next note.

Prefer to talk?

Skip the reading — book a call and we'll get specific about your project.

◆ Free call◆ Reply in 24h◆ Named team